Back
CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Somwati – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Chandra Kumar Rai, J.
Heard Mr. Rajeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Abhisekh Shukla learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and Shri Krishna Kant Singh, learned counsel for the respondent- Goan Shabha.
2. Brief facts of the case are that one Smt. Mittha Devi @ Mithula Devi wife of Salik Ram was the owner of plot No.944/15 area 0.405 hectare and Parsadi son of Badale was owner of plot No.944/13 area 0.405 hectare, who belongs to scheduled caste community. The aforementioned plots are situated at village Vasundhara, Pargana Marhara, Thesil and District Etah. Petitioner is the daughter of Prasadi. Smt. Mittha Devi had executed a registered will deed on 21.1.2000 in respect to his share of the plot in dispute in favour of respondent no.6-Jaydan Singh, whose name was also mutated in the revenue records on the basis of afore mentioned will deed vide order dated 30.8.2010. A restoration application was filed by Suresh Chandra on 17.5.2016 along with delay condonation against the order dated 30.8.2010 in respect to the aforementioned will deed dated 21.1.2000 with the allegation that execution of the will deed by Mittha Devi @ Mithula De
The Assistant Collector First Class is the sole authority to declare agricultural land transactions void under Section 166 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act.
Only the Assistant Collector First Class is authorized to declare transactions void under Section 157-A of the U.P. Z.A. and L.R. Act, requiring proper inquiry into caste claims before such declarati....
The court reiterated that admissions in a written statement regarding property transactions create binding effects on claims of ownership, thereby restricting contesting rights based on previously es....
Mutation proceedings under the U.P. Land Revenue Act do not confer title and are subject to the outcome of civil suits regarding property rights.
Mutation proceedings under the U.P. Land Revenue Act do not confer title and are subject to civil suits for declaration of rights.
The court affirmed that land recorded as Abadi under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, remains vested in the State, allowing for resumption under Section 117(6) despite claims ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
