JUDGMENT

Chandra Kumar Rai, J.

Heard Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Yadav, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey holding brief of Mr. Amzad Rza, learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4 and Mr. Jitendra Narain Rai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents

2. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner is chak holder No. 503 and original plots of petitioner are Gata No. 222, 325/1, 494 M area 0.143. Assistant Consolidation Officer has proposed single chak to the petitioner of plot No. 494 M area 0.141 hectare. Respondent No.3 is chak holder No. 745 and original plots of the respondent No.3 area 457/2, 457/1, 494M area 0.377 hectare. Assistant Consolidation Officer has proposed two chaks to respondent No.3 first chak on plot No. 494M and second chak on plot No.457/1M total area 0.332 hectare. Against the proposal of Assistant Consolidation Officer, chak objection was filed by respondent No.6, which was decided vide order dated 10.04.2023. Against the order of Consolidation Officer dated 10.04.2023 chak appeal under Section 21 (2) of U.P.C.H. Act was filed by respondent No.3 before the Settlement Officer of Consolidation claiming allotment of plot