JUDGMENT :

Chandra Kumar Rai, J.

1. Heard Sri Dinesh Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri .K. Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri S.K. Yadav as well as Sri .M. Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent nos. 5, 6 & 7 and Sri Ashutosh Kumar Rai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.

2. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner is Chak Holder of Chak No. 799 & 800. Respondent No. 5 is Chak Holder No. 65. The Assistant Consolidation Officer has proposed single Chak to the petitioner on plot nos. 489M, 496M, 505M. Against the proposal of Assistant Consolidation Officer the Chak Objection was filed by petitioner, which was decided by Consolidation Officer ide order dated 11.02.2020 allotting the Plot No. 496, in which his source of irrigation is situated along with the Plot No. 505. Petitioner was also allotted Plot No. 500, 499 under the order of Consolidation Officer dated 11.02.2020. Against the order of Consolidation Officer petitioner filed Chak Appeal before the Settlement Officer Consolidation claiming that he should be allotted Chak over plot nos. 536 & 539 in place of plot nos. 499 & 500. The aforementioned appeal filed by the petitioners was