SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2229

MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, DONADI RAMESH
S. V. Brothers – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shubham Agrawal.
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has challenged the seizure order dated 12.08.2023 passed by respondent no. 2 under the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') as well as the penalty order dated 20.08.2023 also passed by the same respondent. The petitioner has also prayed for a direction to respondent no. 2 to drop auction proceedings of the seized goods as per notice dated 28.10.2023.

2. The second respondent had intercepted a consignment of Areca Nuts from truck bearing registration no. UP53 DT 9190. The petitioner, who is the consignee of the goods as mentioned in the bilty, invoice and e-way bill and is registered under the Act in Delhi applied for temporary registration. The petitioner after passing of the seizure order filed an application on 17.08.2023 for release of seized goods in its favour on the footing that he being the consignee, is entitled to release of the goods in terms of Section 129 (1)(a) of the Act after payment of penalty equal to 200% of the tax payable on the seized goods. However, by order dated 28.08.2023, respondent no. 2 declined to release the seized goods in favour of the petitioner and also l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top