SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1730

JASPREET SINGH
Gyan Prakash Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Principal Judge Family Court Lko. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sameer Singh and Sakshi Singh

JUDGMENT

Jaspreet Singh, J.

Heard Shri Sameer Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The instant petition has been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:-

    (i) Exercise its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of Constitution of India and conduct an enquiry against opposite parties, considering the fact that the opposite party no.2 has acted negligently and the opposite party no.1 has no administrative control over Family Court Lucknow and the other facts mentioned in the present petition and thereafter, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to take suitable and appropriate action against the opposite parties.

    (ii) Issue any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case.

3. The petitioner is a practicing Advocate at Family Court, Lucknow and has a standing of 35 years. It is the case of the petitioner, that a matrimonial dispute was pending between Deepshikha Singh and Dr. Pawan Singh wherein the present petitioner was the counsel appearing before the Family Court on behalf of Dr. Pawan Singh. It is also the case of the petitioner that a petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top