SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2153

JASPREET SINGH
Devi Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Agyaram Pandey – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Atul Mishra.
For the Respondent: Dinesh Kumar.

JUDGMENT

Jaspreet Singh, J.

Heard Shri Anchal Mishra, learned counsel for the appellants and Shri Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel, who has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent No.3.

2. The record indicates that this Court by means of the order dated 03.07.2023 had required the Registrar of this Court to serve a copy of the order dated 03.07.2023 on the respondent No.3 - Company, because despite the service, none had appeared which was causing the delay in disposal of the appeal which is pending since 2010. In furtherance thereof, Shri Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel has put in appearance along with Shri Prashant Gaur, Legal Executive of the respondent No.3.

3. The Court has heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record.

4. The instant appeal has been preferred under section 173 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 seeking enhancement of the award dated 06.09.2010 passed by the MACT/Additional District Judge, Court No.5, Gonda in Claim Petition No.62/2008 wherein in a death case, a sum of Rs.4,17,500/- alongwith 6% interest has been awarded in favour of the appellants-claimants.

5. The submission of the learned counsel for the appellants is that the Tribun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top