SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2030

JASPREET SINGH
Madhu – Appellant
Versus
Addl. District Judge Court No. 4, Sitapur – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Manju Singh.

JUDGMENT

Jaspreet Singh, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. In furtherance of the order dated 05.01.2024, the counsel for the petitioner has filed the supplementary-affidavit which is taken on record.

3. Under challenge is the order dated 16.12.2023 passed by the Additional District Judge, Court no.4, Sitapur.

4. In order to appreciate the controversy involved in the instant petition, briefly the facts giving rise to the same is being noticed hereinafter.

5. One Satish Kumar instituted a suit seeking cancellation of sale deed which was registered as Regular Suit No.263 of 2008. In the said suit, the defendants were Shanti Devi and Madhu Devi. The record further indicates that Madhu Devi is the successor in interest of Shanti Devi who had executed a sale deed in her favour. The record further indicates that the suit bearing No.263 of 2008 came to be dismissed by the trial court in exercise of power under section 151 CPC on 28.07.2012.

6. Being aggrieved against the order dated 28.07.2012, an appeal was preferred by Satish Kumar alongwith one Ram Pyari. The said appeal was registered as Civil Appeal No.97 of 2012. However, objections were raised by the present petitioner i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top