SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2321

JAYANT BANERJI
Rama Shankar Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:Abhishek Kumar Srivastava, Advocate.
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla.

JUDGMENT

Jayant Banerji, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned Standing Counsel appears for respondent nos. 1, 2 and 4. Sri Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no.3- Gram Panchayat.

2. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-

    "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 13.12.2022 passed in Case No. RES/3604/22 Azamgarh arising out of Computerized Case No. AL20221506003604 Rama Shankar Lal and others v. Gram Panchayat and others by the Member, Board of Revenue U.P. Prayagraj (Annexure No. 5 to the writ petition).

    (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to act upon the order impugned."

3. The order impugned appears to have been passed on the restoration application dated 14.11.2022 filed by the petitioners for restoring the revision that was dismissed on 13.12.2013. The restoration application was filed along with a delay condonation application under Section 5 of the LIMITATION ACT . The reason for delay mentioned in the affidavit filed in support of the application under Section 5 of the LIMITAT

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top