SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2352

K. J. THAKER
Beili Alias Beili – Appellant
Versus
Dharam Raj Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants : Piyush Misra, Vineet Kumar Singh

Table of Content
1. handling of motor accident compensation claims. (Para 1 , 3)
2. arguments regarding compensation amount and justification. (Para 4 , 6 , 7)
3. court's reasoning on compensation and non-pecuniary damages. (Para 5 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. ratio regarding interest and tax implications. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. final order on compensation and procedural directives. (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT

Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, J.

By way of this appeal, the appellants have challenged the judgment and decree dated 20.1.1997 and 11.2.1997 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / 1st Additional District Judge, Mau (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal') in M.A.C.P. No.34 of 1992 (Beili and others v. Dharam Raj Singh and another) awarding sum of Rs.72,000/- as compensation to the claimants/appellants with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing the claim petition.

2. Heard Mr.Vineet Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the appellants and Shri Anubhav Sinha, learned counsel for the Insurance Company

3. The brief facts of the case are that claimants-appellants filed a Motor Accident Claim Petition before the Tribunal for claiming the compensation under MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 19

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top