K. J. THAKER
Janki Devi – Appellant
Versus
Bhikam Rathore – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accident details and compensation awarded (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. final decision on appeal and thanks to participants (Para 4 , 12 , 17) |
| 3. arguments for compensation adjustments (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. computation of compensation and interest (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. guidelines for disbursement and tax considerations (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, J.
By way of this appeal, the appellants have challenged the judgment and award dated 5.4.1999 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / X-Additional District Judge, Agra (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal') in M.A.C.P. No.803 of 1998 (Smt.Janki Devi and others v. Bhikam Rathore and others) awarding sum of Rs.3,00,000/- as compensation to the claimant/appellant with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of filing the claim petition.
2. Heard Mr.Madhav Jain, learned counsel for the appellants-claimants and Mr.Nagendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents.
3. The brief facts of the case are that claimants-appellants filed Motor Accident Claim Petition before the Tribunal for claiming the compensation under MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 for the death of Prem Shankar Sharma in a ro
A.V. Padma v. Venugopal, 2012 (1) GLH (SC)
Smt. Hansaguri P. Ladhani v. The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
Purpose of keeping compensation is to safeguard interest of claimants.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the proper assessment of income and calculation of compensation in motor accident claim cases, based on relevant legal provisions and precedents.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.