IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J.
Manish Kumar Singh - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. And 4 Others - Respondents
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) NO. 472 OF 2023.
Decided On : 27-04-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. impleadment of parties in pil. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. grievance regarding land use for water tank. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments for and against water tank construction. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. petitioner's credentials and public interest. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. verification of petitioner's credentials is essential. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. definition and significance of credentials. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. pil dismissed due to lack of credentials. (Para 17) |
| 8. government prerogative in land use decisions. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 9. final dismissal of the pil. (Para 21) |
ORDER
Kshitij Shailendra, J.
Order on Civil Misc. Impleadment Application No.02 of 2023.
Considering the facts stated in the affidavit supporting impleadment application as well as during the course of arguments, I feel it necessary to permit impleadment of Anand Prakash and five others as respondents in the present writ petition.
2. Shri Pramod Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the applicants seeking impleadment shall incorporate the said impleadment during the course of the day in the present writ petition.
3. The impleadment application is allowed.
Order on Writ Petition.
4. Heard Shri Sharad Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents, Shri Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent no.5-Gaon Sabha and Shri Pramod Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for newly impleaded respondents.
5. This writ petition, in the nature of a public interest litigation, has been filed with the prayer to direct the respondent nos.2 and 3 to take immediate steps for restraining the respondent no.5, not to make water tank in Gata No.515 situated in Village- Karkhia Rustam Sarai, Tehsil -Sagari, District-Azamgarh which is public utility recorded as "Pokhari". Further prayer is to direct the respondent nos.2 and 3 to decide the application filed by the petitioner on 24.01.2023.
6. A perusal of aforesaid application shows that the grievance raised by the petitioner is that water tank be not established on Gata No.515 and order be passed for construction of water tank over Gata Nos.518, 507, 522,756-k and 33. The persons whose impleadment application has been allowed claim to be rightful occupants over the land covered by Gata No.518 and alongwith impleadment application a copy of plaint of suit filed by them under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code-2006 (in short 'the Code-2006') has also been filed.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that land covered by Gata No.515 is a "Pokhari" and, therefore, no water tank can be constructed thereon as earlier efforts were made to maintain the said Gata as "Pokhari".
8. Learned Standing Counsel has placed instructions before this Court which are taken on record. The instructions reveal that the land suggested by the petitioner by means of an application dated 24.01.2023 is not suitable for want of availability of requisite area on the spot. The instructions further speak regarding registration of case against the occupants of Gata No.518 being Case No.T202115060706938 (Report v. Dheerendra) in which 28.02.2023 was a date fixed. Instructions further reveal that water tank is being constructed under the Jal Jeevan Mission Scheme of the Government.
9. Learned counsel for the newly impleaded respondents has vehemently opposed the writ petition on various grounds:-
Minor construction on land reserved for public purposes does not alter its nature, and objections lacking substantial evidence are invalid in public interest litigation.
Point of Law : Courts must do justice by promotion of good faith, and prevent law from crafty invasions. Courts must maintain the social balance by interfering where necessary for the sake of justice....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the duty of the State to hold and manage communal properties, such as water bodies, for the benefit of the community. The judgment also emphasizes ....
Public interest litigations must be filed by individuals acting bona fide in genuine public interest; misuse for personal motives is impermissible.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India should not be used to determine administrative matters, and t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.