SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1833

SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, MANJIVE SHUKLA
Ashok Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ashish Kumar Srivastava.
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Udit Chandra.

JUDGMENT

Heard Shri. Ashish Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri. Udit Chandra, learned counsel for the respondent-Distribution Corporation and learned Standing Counsel for the State.

2. The writ petition has been filed with the following main relief :

    "Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to respondent nos. 2 to 4 to provide electricity connection in the portion of premises No. D-36/17-18 Augustkunda, Varanasi which is under occupation of the petitioners-tenants."

3. Admitted facts of the case are, the petitioners were the inducted as tenants of the disputed premises being D-36/17-18 Agastkunda, Varanasi. At that time, there existed an electricity connection in the premises thus let out to the petitioners.

4. According to the petitioners, the respondent-landlord was seeking to forcibly evict the petitioners. The petitioners filed Original Suit No. 154 of 2011, wherein vide order dated 19.07.2011, the learned Civil Judge (J.D.) City Varanasi granted injunction in favour of the petitioners restraining the respondent from evicting the petitioners except in accordance with law.

5. Later, respondent no. 5 brought another proceeding being S.C.C. Suit No. 4

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top