SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1854

SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, MANJIVE SHUKLA
K R Pulp Papers Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Goods And Services Tax Council – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Suyash Agarwal
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Heard Sri. Suyash Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri. Amit Mahajan, learned counsel for respondent No.3 and Sri. Ankur Agarwal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.4, 5 and 6.

2. In connected Writ Tax No.1393 of 2023, following submissions were noted:

    "2. Besides challenge raised to the validity of the Notification No. 09/2023 dated 31.3.2023 and Notification No. 515/SI-2-23-9(47)/17-T.C215-U.P. Act-1- 2017-Order-(273/2023) dated 24.4.2023, there did not exist any valid reason to grant second extension of time to issue show cause notice under Section 73(10) of the U.P. GST Act, 2020. Consequently, the show cause notice dated 30.9.2023 is described to be time barred. Reliance has been placed on interim order granted in similar Writ Petition being Writ-Tax No. 1256 of 2023 (M/s Graziano Transmission v. GST and 5 Others), dated 17.11.2023."

3. In the present case, it has further been submitted that the further impugned notification No.56 of 2023 dated 28th December, 2023, has been issued only under the Central GST Act, 2017, that too, without prior approval of the GST council. In any case, no parallel notification has been issued under the UP G

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top