SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1980

VIVEK CHAUDHARY, OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
Rajesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Vikas Singh.
For the Respondent: C.S.C., A.S.G., Murli Manohar Srivastava, Raj Kumar Singh.

JUDGMENT

Om Prakash Shukla, J.

The petitioners claiming to have obtained Certificate from the respondent no.5-Count Mattei Association to practice Electro Homeopathy System of Medicines, has approached this Court by way of the present writ, praying inter-alia for quashing the order/circular dated 25.11.2003 (Annexure-1) issued by the Union of India and Government Order dated 01.06.2004 (Annexure-41) issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh. A direction for non-interference by the respondents and consequential relief of permitting them to practice Electro Homoeopathy system of alternate Medicine in the State of Uttar Pradesh, till the rules in that regard are framed by the competent authority, has also been sought by them. Reliance is placed upon a judgment of the Delhi High Court (Annexure-14 and 15), which according to them, stands affirmed by the Supreme Court (Annexure-16 & 17).

2. Heard Shri. Vikas Singh, learned Counsel representing the petitioners, Shri. Raj Kumar Singh, learned Counsel representing the respondent no.1/Union of India, learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondents no. 2 to 4 and Shri. Murli Manohar Srivastava, learned Counsel representing the respondent no.5.

3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top