SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 2486

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
SUNIL BENIWAL, J.
Mangilal Nirban Homoeopathic Medical College – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos. 16431, 17432, 19286 of 2018
Decided On : 27-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Akhilesh Rajpurohit, Vineet Dave, Ankur Mathur, Sourabh Rajpurohit, Lakshya Singh Udawat, Kaushik Dave, Nishant Bapna
For the Respondents: Bharat Vyas, B.P. Bohra, Vivek Shrimali, Vaibhav Bhansali, Sunil Joshi

The UOI cannot impose NEET qualifications for AYUSH admissions without legislative backing, as executive actions cannot override statutory regulations.

Headnote:(A) Homeopathy Central Council Act, 1973 - Sections 20 and 33 - The petitioner challenges communications issued by the Ministry of AYUSH mandating NEET/AIPGET qualifications for admission into AYUSH courses. The court finds these communications lack statutory backing and cannot impose eligibility without amending existing regulations. (Paras 25 and 26)

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - Maintainability - The petitioners contend that non-joinder of the National Commission for Homeopathy does not impair the maintainability, as the core issue pertains to the competence of the UOI to impose new eligibility criteria. (Paras 5 and 11)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, self-financed homeopathy colleges, contested various communications issued by the Ministry of AYUSH mandating NEET qualifications for admissions for academic year 2018-19, arguing that such conditions were not statutorily authorized. (Paras 2 and 22)

Findings of Court:
The Court held that the UOI exceeded its authority by not amending the relevant regulations before introducing eligibility criteria via administrative directives. (Paras 25 and 26)

Issues: The primary issue was whether the UOI could impose NEET/AIPGET qualifications without amending the existing statutory regulations governing admissions to AYUSH courses. (Paras 10 and 24)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that executive actions cannot alter statutory requirements, affirming the need for legislative amendments before such eligibility criteria can be introduced. (Paras 24 and 25)

Result: Writ petitions allowed; communications mandating NEET qualifications quashed.

Table of Content
1. common issues in homeopathy college admissions (Para 1 , 2)
2. need for judicial review and party requirement (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court's observation on case merits (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. impugned communications scrutinized (Para 16 , 17 , 19)
5. executive authority limitations in admission criteria (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
6. uoi lacks authority for neet criteria (Para 25)
7. judgment allowing writ petitions and quashing communications (Para 26)

ORDER :

1. Since the above titled writ petitions filed by the private universities, involve common issues based on similar facts, therefore, they are being decided by this common order. However, for brevity, the facts, as narrated in SBCWP No.16431/2018 are taken into consideration.

2. The facts in brief are that the petitioners are self financed Homeopathy colleges and are running various courses in Homeopathy including post graduation courses in Homeopathy. The respondent No.3 had issued NEET, BAMS, BUMS, BHMS, BNYS Counselling 2018 Information Booklet, which provides information about centralized admission to all Government and Private Ayurved / Unani / Homeopathy / Naturopathy and Yoga Colleges for academic session 2018-19 in Bachelor courses of Ayurvedic, Unani, Homeopathy, Naturopathy & Yoga by the BAMS / BUMS/ BHMS / BNYS Admission Board NEET-2018 constituted by the State Government.

2.1 The respondent No.3 later issued programme of counselling on 21.09.2018 for the academic year 2018-19 for admission in Bachelor course of Ayurvedic, Unani, Homeopathy, Yoga and Naturopathy which was followed by another notice dated 03.10.2018, whereby online applications were invited for filling up of NRI seats for the academic session 2018-19. A notice for second round of counselling was issued on 09.10.2018 for filling up of vacant seats for the academic session 2018-19.

2.2 The petitioners, during the said counselling process, came to know that NRI quota seats were not filled and the respondent No.3 was in the process of filling those unfilled seats with general category candidates. The petitioners were later informed that the said procedure is being adopted based on the directions issued by the Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy (‘AYUSH’), but, the respondent No.3 could only allot 267 students out of 745 students in Bachelor of Homeopathy Medicine and Surgery (‘BHMS’) course. The reason for not filling up of the vacant seats was only because of wrong application of eligibility criteria of NEET qualification.

2.3 The grievance raised in the writ petition is with regard to series of communications issued by the Government of India, Ministry of AYUSH on various occasions which were addressed to all the State Authorities intimating that admissions in AYUSH undergraduate courses are to be given based on the merit list of NEET only from the academic year 2018-2019. The said communications were sent on 23.01.2017, 26.04.2017, 12.02.2018, 21.02.2018, 14.05.2018, 05.06.2018, 11.06.2018 and 15.06.2018. Consequently, the State Government issued communications dated 09.08.2018 and 12.10.2018 to NEET 2018 Counseling Board to fill up the vacant seats of NRI quota. Thus, the aforementioned notice dated 03.10.2018 came to be published by the Counseling Board whereby online applications were sought to fill the NRI vacant seats so also it was indicated that the merit list of NEET would be considered for the same. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has laid challenge to the aforementioned communications sent by the Government of India, Ministry of AYUSH to the State authorities so also the subsequent communications sent by the State Government to the Counseling Board. Further, the communication dated 21.09.2018 sent by Government of India, Ministry of AYUSH to all State Authorities has been challenged whereby the qualification of AIPGET 2018 was mandated to participate in AYUSH PG Courses for the academic year 2018-201

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top