SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Priyanshu Undaviya – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


ORDER

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

CM APPL. 10133/2022

1. This is an application filed on behalf of the petitioners for taking additional documents on record.

2. The prayer made in the application is allowed, subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 451/2022 and CM APPL. 1274/2022[Application filed on behalf of the petitioners for interim relief]

3. This matter has been received on transfer from Division Bench-I today.

4. Our attention has been drawn by the counsel for the petitioners to the order of the Supreme Court dated 17.02.2022, passed in Special Leave Petition No.1709/2022.

4.1. We are informed by Mr Animesh Kumar, who appears on behalf of the petitioners, that notice in the writ petition as well as interlocutory application i.e., CM Appl. 1274/2022 was issued on 10.01.2022.

4.2. A perusal of the order dated 10.01.2022 shows that on that date, notice was accepted on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 4. It is in this context that a direction was issued, via the very same order, to issue notice to respondent nos.5 and 6, which was made returnable on 30.03.2022. However, the office report generated by the Registry shows that notices could not issue, as a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top