SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Rajiv Shakdher, Talwant Singh, JJ.
Priyanshu Undaviya - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 451 of 2022, CM Appls. 1274 of 2022 and 10133 of 2022
Decided On : 25-02-2022




The court emphasized that any educational regulations for admissions, such as NEET, must comply with statutory procedures, failing which they are rendered unenforceable.

Headnote:(A) National Commission for Indian System of Medicine Act, 2020 - Section 14 - National Commission for Homeopathy Act, 2020 - Section 141 - Application for admission to Homeopathy stream - Petitioners challenged the necessity of qualifying NEET for admissions, citing differences with Modern Medicine - Court noted the impugned regulations under the repealed Act were quashed; hence, NEET qualification standards were unenforceable - The court recognizes the need for uniform educational standards across streams - Interim relief granted for provisional admissions to leftover seats post-NEET - Petitioners must be prepared for voidance of admissions if unsuccessful in the writ petition. (Paras 5-13)

(B) Examination Standards - Statutory compliance mandates adherence to educational standards - Failure to circulate draft regulations for stakeholder input renders regulations illegal - The court highlighted the importance of following legislative procedures. (Paras 8, 10, 12)

ORDER

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

CM APPL. 10133/2022

1. This is an application filed on behalf of the petitioners for taking additional documents on record.

2. The prayer made in the application is allowed, subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 451/2022 and CM APPL. 1274/2022[Application filed on behalf of the petitioners for interim relief]

3. This matter has been received on transfer from Division Bench-I today.

4. Our attention has been drawn by the counsel for the petitioners to the order of the Supreme Court dated 17.02.2022, passed in Special Leave Petition No.1709/2022.

4.1. We are informed by Mr Animesh Kumar, who appears on behalf of the petitioners, that notice in the writ petition as well as interlocutory application i.e., CM Appl. 1274/2022 was issued on 10.01.2022.

4.2. A perusal of the order dated 10.01.2022 shows that on that date, notice was accepted on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 4. It is in this context that a direction was issued, via the very same order, to issue notice to respondent nos.5 and 6, which was made returnable on 30.03.2022. However, the office report generated by the Registry shows that notices could not issue, as although process fee was filed, the same has been returned under objection.

5. Be that as it may, Mr Animesh says that, although in the writ petition a challenge has been laid to Section 14 of the National Commission for Indian System of Medicine Act, 2020 (hereafter referred to as "2020 Ayurveda Act") and Section 141 of the National Commission for Homeopathy Act, 2020 (hereafter referred to as the "2020 Homeopathy Act"), however, having regard to the urgency in the matter, for the moment, counsel for the petitioner seeks to press only the interlocutory application. Furthermore, at this juncture, interim order is sought by the petitioners confined to admission in the Homeopathy stream.

6. Mr Animesh says that the petitioners., to obtain admission in the Homeopathy stream, are required to qualify the National Eligibility-cum- Entrance Test (in short 'NEET'). It is not in dispute that this requirement applies to the other allied streams such as Ayurveda, Unani, Siddha and Sowa Rigpa Systems as well, apart from the Homeopathy stream [hereafter collectively referred to as "alternate medicine stream"]

6.1. Besides this, it is necessary to qualify the NEET examination for candidates who wish to enter the Modern Medicine stream

7. The grievance of the petitioners, thus, to put it broadly lies in this periphery.

7.1. According to the petitioners, they should not be subjected to NEET examination, as the Modern Medicine stream is, in many ways, i.e., in course and content different to alternate medicine stream. It is emphasised that since modes of treatment are, markedly, different, the course content is decidedly not the same.

7.2. Apart from anything else, Mr Animesh contends that with the enactment of the 2020 Ayurveda Act and the 2020 Homeopathy Act, the earlier Acts i.e., the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 (hereafter referred to as "1970 Ayurveda Act") and the Homeopathy Central Council Act, 1973 (hereafter referred to as "1973 Homeopathy Act") have been repealed.

7.3. It is also Mr Animesh's contention that the Homoeopathy (Degree Course) Amendment Regulations, 2018 2 (hereafter referred to as "2018 Homeopathy Regulations"), framed under the erstwhile Act, which, in turn, brought about the amendment in the Homeopathy (Degree Course) Regulations, 1983, do not, presently, survive despite the savings provision incorporated in the 2020 Homeopathy Act i.e., Section 59(2)3 of the 2020 Homeopathy Act. [The said amendment was enacted via notification dated 14.12.2018.]

7.3(a) This assertion has been made by Mr Animesh, based on the judgment of the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court dated 31.08.2021, passed in W.P.(C) No.100650/2021, titled The Karnataka Private Homeopathic Medical Colleges Management Association and Ors. vs. Union

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top