SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1954

PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Naeem Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Syed Fahim Ahmed
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Piyush Agrawal, J.

Heard Sri. Syed Fahim Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri. Rishi Kumar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 25.10.2017 passed by the respondent no.3 in Case No. 201713590572 under Section 47A(3) of Indian Stamp Act and the order dated 31.05.2018 passed by the respondent no.2 in Revision No. 00105 of 2018 (Computerized No. C201813000000105).

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners have purchased an agricultural land by way of execution of Sale deed dated 29.04.2016 and paid the due stamp duty thereof. Thereafter, on the basis of an ex-parte report, a notice was issued to which the petitioners have submitted their objection/reply. Thereafter, again on the request of the petitioners, a spot inspection was made. In the said inspection, it was found that over the property in question, agricultural activity were being undertaken and presently also, agricultural activity are being undertaken. Counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of specific finding in the said report, the Collector while passing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top