SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2797

PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Manoj Steel Traders – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Suyash Agarwal
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Piyush Agrawal, J.

Heard Shri Suyash Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned ACSC for the State - respondent.

2. The present writ petition is being entertained in view of the fact that no GST Tribunal has been constituted in the State of U.P.

3. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 23.02.2021 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Grade - 2 (Appeals - 4), Ghaziabad by which the appeal of the petitioner has been dismissed on the ground of limitation.

4. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is a registered dealer and deals with the business of iron and steel. On 18.03.2018, while the goods were transported, the respondent no. 3 intercepted the goods and found that eway bill - 01 was not available with documents and consequently detained the goods and a notice was issued under section 129(3) of the UPGST Act directing the petitioner to deposit the tax and penalty. Aggrieved against the order dated 18.03.2018, the petitioner filed Writ Tax No. 500/2018, in which vide order dated 28.03.2018, an interim order was passed releasing the goods of the petitioner, along with vehicle. Ultimately, on 28.03.2018, the responden

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top