SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2638

SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, RAJENDRA KUMAR IV
Sunil Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Commercial Tax – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ajay Kumar Yadav
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Yadav learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ankur Agarwal learned Standing Counsel.

2. Challenge has been raised to the adjudication order dated 31.5.2021 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Sector-10 Prayagraj with reference to ZD0904210095997 against the petitioner.

3. In the first place, the above order was appealable. Then, period of limitation to file that appeal has expired.

4. Despite the above two objection raised by the learned Standing Counsel, there is something more fundamental and critical both to the rights of the petitioner as also to the general scheme of the U.P. GST Act, 2017 and its implementation that commends us to entertain this petition.

5. Upon hearing learned counsel for parties, it is undisputed that the first notice of the above SCN/Statement reference issued to the petitioner is dated 03.4.2021. The impugned order has been passed on 31.5.2021 whereas again undisputed last notice issued to the petitioner, in those proceedings was for the date fixed 08.6.2021 for reply and, 10.6.2021 for personal hearing.

6. Much before the arrival of those dates, impugned order came to be passed and uploaded as has thus been ser

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top