Back
RAJAN ROY
Smt. Laxmi Tomar – Appellant
Versus
General Manager Food Corporation of India Lucknow – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajan Roy, J.
Heard.
2. This petition was filed on 23.05.2011 by the petitioner challenging inter alia the order of punishment dated 26.04.2011 passed by the General Manager, Food Corporation of India, U.P. Region, Lucknow. No interim order was passed therein and the petitioner stood reverted to the post of AG-III(D). Further relief of being allowed to perform her duties was also sought. The petition was amended on 08.04.2013 and relief for reinstatement on the post of Assistant Grade-II (Depot) w.e.f. the date of her reversion to the post of Assistant Grade-III (Depot) under the impugned order as also to pay arrears of salary and her other dues, etc. were added.
3. By means of the impugned order, the petitioner has been reverted from the post of AG-II(D), on which she had been promoted by the order dated 07.11.1985, to the substantive post of AG-III(D) and period of her suspension i.e. from 14.07.2009 to 28.04.2011 was treated as period not spent on duty thereby disentitling her remaining salary for the said period which would also entail break in service affecting her post retiral dues.
4. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the petitioner was substantively appointe
The dismissal of an employee for alleged misconduct must be substantiated by clear evidence; failure to prove the charge renders the dismissal arbitrary and unjust.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the invalidation of the caste certificate and the overruling of previous decisions by a larger bench, leading to the dismissal of the first respond....
Disciplinary termination without jurisdiction violates natural justice; customary divorce acknowledged, rendering bigamy charges invalid under personal law.
A person who fraudulently obtains a caste certificate by misrepresenting facts is not entitled to the benefits reserved for the caste or community mentioned in the certificate.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in disciplinary proceedings, as well as the principles governin....
Point of Law : High Court while exercising powers under Article 226 has power to do substantial justice.
The court established that claims to belong to reserved categories must be substantiated with credible evidence, and fraudulent claims undermine the constitutional provisions for social justice, lead....
A fraudulent document is non est from the beginning and cannot be countenanced in law. A party to a litigation cannot approbate and reprobate from his stand taken before a quasi-judicial authority to....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
