SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1788

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J.
Sanjeev Gupta - Applicant
Versus
State of U.P. and Another - Opposite Parties
APPLICATION U/S 482 NO. 9431 OF 2024.
Decided On : 30-05-2024

Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : In Person

The court upheld that representation by Amicus Curiae suffices for fair hearing, dismissing the recall application for lack of legal grounds.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Sections 362, 317, 385, and 482 - Recall application - Applicant sought to restore Criminal Revision No.2618 of 2019, claiming violation of natural justice due to absence during hearing - Court affirmed conviction under Sections 498-A, 323, 377 IPC and Section 4 of D.P. Act, with modified sentences - Court held that the applicant was represented by Amicus Curiae and his stand was adequately presented - Application dismissed as lacking legal grounds. (Paras 1-20)

Facts of the case:
The applicant was convicted under multiple sections and sought to recall the judgment claiming he was not heard in person during the revision hearing, which he argued violated principles of natural justice.

Findings of Court:
The Court found that the applicant was represented by counsel and his arguments were considered, thus upholding the conviction and dismissing the recall application.

Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant was denied a fair hearing due to his absence during the revision hearing.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that the applicant's representation by Amicus Curiae sufficed for the hearing, and the principles of natural justice were not violated as the applicant's arguments were adequately presented.

Result: Application dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, J.

Instant recall application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to restore the Criminal Revision No.2618 of 2019, Sanjeev Gupta v. State of U.P. and another by recalling the order dated 6.12.2023 and 19.11.2023, passed in the said case in the interest of justice and equity.

2. The brief facts relevant for the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. are that the by means of criminal revision, the revisionist/ accused assailed the judgement of learned A.C.J.M., court no. 8, Ghaziabad in Criminal Case No. 75 of 2016 arising out of Case Crime no. 331 of 2013 under Sections 498-A, 323, 377 IPC and Section 4 of D.P. Act, P.S. Link Road, District Ghaziabad, whereby the revisionist has been convicted of charge under section 498-A, 323, 377 IPC and Section 4 of D.P. Act and was sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment and Rs. 30,000/- fine for charge under Section 498-A IPC and five years rigorous imprisonment and Rs. 20,000/- fine for charge under Section 377 IPC, six months simple imprisonment and Rs. 500/- for charge under Section 323 IPC and one year simple imprisonment and Rs. 1,500/- fine for charge under section 4 D.P. Act and sentences of fine are followed by default stipulation; all the sentences were directed to run concurrently. 50% fine is directed to be paid as compensation to the victim/ informant. The revisionist assailed judgement of trial court in Criminal Appeal No. 129 of 2018 (Sanjeev Gupta v. State of UP) wherein criminal appeal is partly allowed to the extent that conviction for charge under section 498-A, 323, 377 IPC has been affirmed but his conviction and sentence for charge under section 4 of D.P. Act has been set aside. The sentence awarded by the trial court for charge under section 377 IPC has been modified to the extent that five years rigorous imprisonment for charge under section 377 IPC is reduced to four years keeping in view quantum of fine intact. The revisionist impugned both the orders passed by the courts below in criminal revision before this Court, which has been preferred under section 397/401 Cr.P.C.

3. The applicant in person appeared in present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on 22.3.2024, 14.5.2024 and the matter was finally heard on 10.5.2024, wherein the applicant, who is accused/convict in concerned criminal revision No.2618 of 2019 argued in person and learned AGA appearing for the State has advanced his arguments on behalf of the State.

4. The applicant filed his written submissions in support of his contention raised in present application. The crux of the submissions of applicant is that he was not heard in person in said in said criminal revision and it was decided to his detriment as his conviction recorded under Section 498-A and 323 IPC by learned trial court and affirmed by the appellate/session court has been re-affirmed by final order of this Court dated 6.12.2023, which is under challenged in present petition. He further submitted that at the time of hearing of revision on 27.5.2023, he was personally not present before this Court as he was held in jail custody and no intimation for appearance in the Court was given to him by this Court and, therefore, the opportunity of hearing accorded to the revisionist is empty formality due to non affording opportunity of personal hearing to the applicant, in person. He has been prejudicially affected as the bail granted to him in said criminal revision was cancelled by order dated 19.11.2022 and he was sent to jail custody. No personal appearance was afforded to him in said criminal revision by the Court for arguing the case despite written communications sent by him from jail. This Court was pleased to pass an order dated 15.5.2023 to the effect that "Office is directed to inform the revisionist immediately through Jail Authorities by Fax/e-mail about the order to engage an advocate of his choice till the next date of listing." On 27.7.2023, an o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top