Back
SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Daanish Haque – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for recalling order (Para 1) |
| 2. opposition's objections and reliance on prior judgements (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. facts relevant to the case timeline (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. petitioner's misconceptions regarding dismissal (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. legal principles regarding recall and inherent powers (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. court's observations on merits and justice (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. judicial justification for recall of the order (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. discussion on section 362 and its application (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 9. interest of justice in hearing the case (Para 26 , 27) |
| 10. conclusion and final order (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT :
Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.
1. The present application (CRAN 1 of 2023) has been preferred by the petitioner/accused praying for recalling of the Order dated July 19, 2022 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench, thereby dismissing CRR No. 2565 of 2019 ( Daanish Haque v. Central Bureau of Investigation ) on the prayer of the petitioner as ‘Not Pressed’.
2. The Opposite Party/CBI has strongly objected to the said prayer, stating that the prayer of the Petitioner is not maintainable. Their further case is that the application for recall o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
