Mariya Zameel Urf Riya vs State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(All) 1226

RENU AGARWAL
Mariya Zameel Urf Riya – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vijay Kumar Tiwari
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Mrs. Renu Agarwal, J.-Heard Sri Vijay Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Yogesh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

2. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been preferred by the petitioners with the following prayers:

''(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commending the respondents not to harass/torture/illegally arrest the petitioners or to interfere or create hindrance in the peaceful living of the petitioners as living husband and wife and to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners.?

(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.

(iii) Award the cost of the writ petition to the petitioners.''

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that both the petitioners have attained the age of majority. As per high school certificate-cum-marks sheet the date of birth of petitioner No. 1-Mariya Zameel Urf Riya is 25.12.1999 and she is aged about more than 24 years and as per pan card the date of birth of the petitioner No. 2-Mihir Pandey is 4.3.2000 and he