SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2404

SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI
Sh. Vikas Jain – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Raghuvansh Misra.
For the Opposite Party : Parv Agarwal.

Table of Content
1. bail application filed for alleged false accusation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. criteria for granting bail considered. (Para 8 , 9)
3. apex court principles guiding bail decisions. (Para 10)
4. conditions and implications of bail granted. (Para 11 , 12)
5. observations are not on merits; procedural directives. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J.

Second supplementary affidavit is filed and it is taken on record today.

2. Heard Sri. G.S. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri. Raghuvansh Misra and Shri. Ujjwal Sharma, learned counsels for the applicant and Sri. Parv Agarwal, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2.

3. The present bail application has been filed on behalf of applicant Vikas Jain under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case No. 2924 of 2023 for offence punishable under Section 132 (1)(b)(i) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, Department DGGI, Ghaziabad, during pendency of the trial, after rejecting the bail application of the applicant by Sessions Judge, Meerut vide order dated 31.10.2023.

4. Learned senior counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top