SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2402

SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI
Rajnish Jain – Appellant
Versus
Directoate General Of Gst Intelligence Zonal Unit – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Pooja Srivastava, Ravi Agrawal
For the Opposite Party : Dhananjay Awasthi

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J.

Rejoinder affidavit filed today by learned counsel for the applicant, which is taken on record.

2. Heard Sri Anoop Trivedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Pooja Srivastava and Sri Ravi Agrawal, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Dhananjay Awasthi, learned counsel D.G.G.I and perused the material on record.

3. The present bail application has been filed on behalf of applicant Rajnish Jain under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 2415 of 2021 for offence punishable under Sections 132 (1)(b) & (c) read with Section 132 (1)(i) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 read with Section 69 of CGST Act, Department DGGI, Meerut, during pendency of the trial, after rejecting the bail application of the applicant by Sessions Judge, Meerut vide order dated 03.07.2023. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the applicant has been arrested without assigning any reason to believe nor any satisfaction to justified his arrest as provided in the Code. It is further

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top