SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2395

SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
Shubham Shukla – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Priyanka Srivastava, Arun Kumar Srivastava
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Kumar Singh, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P./opposite party no.1 and perused the record.

2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant to quash the summoning order dated 04.07.2022 and proceedings of case no. 16/IX/2022 (Virendra Kumar v. Shubham Shukla), under section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Banda, pending in the court of Special Judicial Magistrate-I, Banda.

3. In short compass, the prosecution case is that the opposite party no. 2 has filed a complaint under Section 138 N.I. Act dated 03.11.2021/30.11.2021 against the applicant alleging inter-alia that in January 2019, applicant borrowed a sum of Rs. 10 lac from the opposite party no. 2 on the promise that the same shall be returned in October, 2020. The applicant, in order to discharge his liability, gave a cheque no. "009519" dated 29.10.2020 of Rs. 10 lac to the opposite party no. 2 but on presenting the said cheque in the bank on 27.01.2021, it was dishonoured on 12.04.2021. Thereafter, the information about the dishonour of the cheque was immediately

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top