Sameer Raza vs State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 2429

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 2429

RAJIV GUPTA
Sameer Raza – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Vikrant Gupta
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

Table of Content
1. facts of applicant's cheque dishonor. (Para 2)
2. allegations of cheque dishonor under n.i. act. (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments against liability for dishonored cheque. (Para 5 , 6)
4. state's rebuttal of applicant's claims. (Para 7 , 8)
5. arguments for maintaining the legal presumption under the n.i. act. (Para 9)
6. judicial interpretation of section 138 n.i. act. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
7. rejection of arguments against cheque liability. (Para 15)
8. final ruling on application merit and dismissal. (Para 16 , 19)
9. final assessment and dismissal of application. (Para 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT

Rajiv Gupta, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing summoning order dated 11.8.2022 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 3, Rampur, in Complaint Case No. 228 of 2022 ( Haseeb Ahmad v. Sameer Raza ) under Section 138 of N.I. Act, P.S. Civil Line, District Rampur, as well as order dated 30.11.2022 passed by learned Session Judge in Criminal Revision No. 97 of 2022 ( Sameer Raza v. State of U.P. ) affirming the impugned ord