Back
SARAL SRIVASTAVA
Sohanwati – Appellant
Versus
Ravindra Singh Chauhan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Saral Srivastava, J.
Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The present appeal has been preferred by the claimants/appellants for enhancement of compensation against the judgement and award dated 20.02.2007 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Court No.3, Aligarh in M.A.C.P. No. 303 of 2004.
3. Challenging the said award, learned counsel for the appellants has submitted no amount towards future prospect has been awarded by the Tribunal, whereas considering the age of the deceased i.e.25 years, the claimants/ appellants are entitled to 40% towards future prospect in view of the judgement of Apex Court in the case of National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi and Others 2017 (16) SCC 680. It is further submitted that there were six dependents upon the deceased, therefore, considering the judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Sarla Verma and others v. Delhi Transport Corporation and others 2009 (6) SCC 121,Tribunal should have deducted 1/4 towards personal expenses of the deceased instead of 1/3. Lastly, it is contended that the Tribunal has erred in law in applying the multiplier of
The court modified the tribunal's compensation award based on established legal precedents regarding future prospects and deduction ratios in compensation calculations.
The appropriate multiplier for compensation in motor accident claims should be based on the deceased's age, with additional allowances for future prospects and non-pecuniary damages.
The appropriate multiplier for calculating compensation must consider the age of the deceased, and 10% future prospects should be included in the compensation amount.
The court established that compensation for a deceased must consider the age-based multiplier and future prospects, enhancing the total amount awarded.
Compensation calculations in motor accident claims must include allowances and future prospects, with appropriate multipliers based on the deceased's age.
The court established that compensation calculations must accurately reflect the deceased's age, income, dependents, and future prospects, adhering to established legal precedents.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the correct computation of compensation in motor accident claims, including the consideration of future prospects, application of the correct multi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the principles from Sarla Verma and Pranay Sethi cases to calculate compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the correct computation of compensation in motor accident claims, including the application of multipliers, deduction of amounts from the deceased'....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
