SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1809

VIPIN CHANDRA DIXIT
Mohini Thapa – Appellant
Versus
Manager /Principle Officer U. P. S. R. T. C. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Pramod Srivastava, Shreesh Srivastava.
For the Respondent: Vipin Kumar Singh.

JUDGMENT

Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.

Heard Sri. Shreesh Srivastava, learned counsel for the appellants, Sri. Vipin Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of U.P.S.R.T.C. and perused the record.

2. This first appeal from order has been filed against the judgment and award dated 01.10.2004, passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Additional District Judge, Court No. 2, Kanpur Nagar, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 789 of 2003, by which compensation of Rs. 1,58,000/- along with 8% interest has been awarded in favour of claimants-appellants on account of death of Suraj Bahadur aged about 24 years.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that the compensation awarded by the claims tribunal is too meager. The claims tribunal has erred in applying the multiplier of 13 on the age of the parents of the deceased, whereas, law has been settled in the case of Smt. Sarla Verma v. D.T.C. reported in 2009 (2) T.A.C. 677 (S.C.) that the multiplier on the age of the deceased would be applicable. Since, the age of the deceased was 24 years at the time of accident, the appropriate multiplier would be 18. It is further submitted that nothing has been awarded towards future

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top