SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1885

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Ram Saran and ors. - Petitioners
Versus
Board of Revenue and ors. - Respondents
WRIT B NO. 162 OF 2024.
Decided On : 15-02-2024

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Prabhakar Vardhan Chaudhary, Santosh Kumar Yadav
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey

The court emphasized that sufficient cause must be shown for condoning delay in appeals, advocating a liberal approach while ensuring timely legal action.

Headnote:(A) U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 166, 167, and 157 AA - Condonation of delay in filing second appeal - The court emphasized that sufficient cause must be shown for delay, and a liberal approach should be taken in such matters to advance substantial justice. (Paras 17, 21.1, 21.2, 21.3)

(B) Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5 - The court reiterated that the discretion to condone delay should be exercised judiciously and not arbitrarily, and that the explanation for delay must be satisfactory. (Paras 17, 22)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners challenged orders dismissing their appeals regarding land transfer issues under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, citing a significant delay in filing the second appeal.

Findings of Court:
The court found the explanation for the 2190-day delay insufficient and upheld the dismissal of the second appeal.

Issues: The main issues included whether the delay in filing the second appeal was adequately explained and whether the lower court's discretion in denying the condonation was appropriate.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioners failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay, emphasizing the need for a liberal approach while also maintaining the importance of timely legal action.

Result: Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Saurabh Lavania, J.

Heard.

2. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with.

3. By means of the present petition the petitioners have assailed the order dated 19.01.2011, 15.05.2013 and 22.05.2023 passed by opposite party no.3, 2 and 1 respectively, as appears from the main relief sought in the present petition, which reads as under:

    "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the judgment & order dated 22.5.2023 passed by opposite party No.1, dismissing Second Appeal No. SA/1595/2019-Lko; Computer Case No. R20191046001595-Ram Saran etc. v. Additional Commissioner Judicial Lucknow Division Lucknow; contained in Annexure No. 1;' & the judgment and order dated 15.5.2013 passed by the opposite party no. 2 dismissing Appeal No. 44/2011-2012-Jwala Prasad etc. v. Sub Divisional Officer/Asstt. Collector First Class; BKT Lucknow and others; contained in Annexure No. 2 & the judgment & other dated 19.1.2011 passed by the opposite party no. 3 in case no. 48/73/10-11 under section 166/167 of the U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act State v. Jwala; contained in Annexure No.3. "

4. The record indicates that a case no. 48/73/10-11 (State v. Jwala Prasad), under Section 166/167 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950 (in short 'Act of 1950'), was instituted with regard to Gata No. 454/0-379 hectare situated in Village Mishrapur, Pargana Mahona, Tehsil Bakshi-Ka-Talab, District Lucknow.

5. Section 166 of the Act of 1950, says that the transfer made in contravention of the Act to be void and Section 167 of the Act of 1950, provides consequence of void transfer and as per this provision the subject matter of transfer including the trees, crop and wells, existing on land shall with effect from the date of transfer, be deemed to have vested in the State Government free from all encumbrances.

6. From order dated 19.01.2011 passed by the opposite party no.3/Sub Divisional Officer/Assistant Collector, First Class Bakshi-Ka-Talab, District Lucknow and the Annexure No. 7 to the present petition, it appears that notices were issued to the concerned, but no one contested the case.

7. The order dated 19.01.2011 indicates that the land in issue, was sold without seeking permission/approval of Assistant Collector in terms of Section 157 AA of the Act of 1950. It is in view of the fact that vendor was of Scheduled Caste category and land in issue, was sold to a person of unreserved category by an unregistered deed, as per which possession of the land was provided to purchaser, and in this view of the matter the permission/approval was required in terms of Section 157 AA of the Act of 1950.

8. The order dated 19.01.2011 provides that the land transferred be recorded in the name of State Government.

9. It would be apt to indicate that as per the case of the petitioners the 'Patta' of land in issue, was provided to Ram Jiyavan and after his death, in the revenue records related to land in issue the name of his two sons namely Jwala Prasad and Jagmohan were entered.

10. Being aggrieved by the order dated 19.01.2011 an appeal was filed by Jwala Prasad son of Ram Jiyavan and Ravi son of Jagmohan.

11. The aforesaid appeal was registered as Appeal No. 44/2011-12 (Jwala Prasad and Others v. Sub Divisional Officer/Assistant Collector First, Bakshi-Ka-Talab, District Lucknow and another) under Section 331 of the Act of 1950. This appeal was dismissed vide order dated 15.05.2013.

12. After dismissal of first appeal vide order dated 15.05.2013, Ramsaran son of Jwala Prasad and Ravi son of Jagmohan filed the second appeal in the month of July 2019 alongwith an application seeking condonation of delay, duly supported with an affidavit. It would be apt to indicate relevant paragraphs of the affidavit, filed in support of the application for condonation of delay, which are as under:-

    ^^2- ;g fd 'kiFkh ds firk Tokyk izlkn gh okn mijksDr dh iSjoh djrs Fks ftudh e`R;q gks xbZ gS vkSj jktLo [krkSuh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top