Back
SAURABH LAVANIA
Parmeshwar – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Devipatan Mandal, Gonda – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Saurabh Lavania, J.
Heard Shri Surya Narayan Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned State Counsel for State-opposite party nos.1 to 3, Shri Vikram Nath Pandey, Advocate on behalf of Shri Pankaj Gupta who has put in appearance on behalf of opp. party no.4 and Shri Karunakar Srivastava, learned counsel for opp. party no.6.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following main relief :-
3. Brief facts of the case are to the effect that undisputedly the petitioner being cosharer of Gata Nos. 489/1-03, 229/0-10, 234/0-17 (in short 'land in issue') situated at Village Udaypur Grant, Pargana Nawabganj, Tehsil Tarabganj, District Gon
A party's acceptance of a report without timely objection precludes later challenges, establishing principles of estoppel in land partition disputes.
The court upheld the finality of the land partition decree, confirming that all procedural safeguards were adhered to in preparing and confirming the Kurra, thus denying the petitioners' claims again....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to adhere to the principles of Rule 109 of U.P. Revenue Code Rules 2016 in the preparation of kurra, and the necessity to consid....
The court reiterated that admissions in a written statement regarding property transactions create binding effects on claims of ownership, thereby restricting contesting rights based on previously es....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that land on the road should be divided amongst all the co-sharers in proportion to their share in the total land holding, as per the Haryana Land ....
The High Court confirmed rights established under a 1955 partition decree, emphasizing that the execution of civil court judgments must be respected without unauthorized administrative interference.
The Revenue Tribunal must ensure compliance with statutory requirements in mutation proceedings, retaining jurisdiction to review such orders despite disputes over title.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
