SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2811

SAURABH LAVANIA
Shatrohan – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Alok Kr. Misra.
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta.

Table of Content
1. challenge against procedural compliance in revenue orders. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. need for adherence to judicially established procedures in property disputes. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court's review finds lack of procedural adherence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. order set aside; remand for fresh proceedings directed. (Para 11 , 12)
5. need for procedural amendments in revenue code for fair application. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT

Saurabh Lavania, J.

Heard Sri Alok Kr. Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the State as also Sri Dileep Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha.

2. Under challenge is the order dated 29.11.2022 passed by the opposite party No.4-Assistant Collector/Tehsildar, Tehsil- Ikauna, District-Shrawasti, in the proceedings carried out against the petitioner under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (in short "Code of 2006") which was registered as Case No.4255 of 2022, Computerized Case No.T202208620204255.

3. The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 19.01.2023 passed by the opposite party No.2-District Magistrate, District- Shrawasti, in the Appeal No.568 of 2022, Computerized Case N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top