SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2417

ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA
Saudagar Rajbhar – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ram Singh Yadav, Rohit Kumar Singh
For the Respondent: Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C.

JUDGMENT :

Ashutosh Srivastava, J.

1. Heard Shri Rohit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State Respondents Nos. 1 to 3. Shri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel, who has put in appearance for the Respondent No. 4.

2. The instant writ petition arises out of proceedings undertaken under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and is directed against the order dated 30.01.2024 passed by the Respondent No. 2, Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue)/Additional Collector, Ghazipur in Restoration Application in Case No. 72 of 2024 (Saudagar Vs. Gaon Sabha), under Section 67(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and order dated 05.01.2024 passed by the Respondent No. 3, Tehsildar (Judicial)/Assistant Collector 1st Class, Tehsil Mohammadabad, District Ghazipur in Case No. 1707 of 2023 (Saudagar Vs. Gaon Sabhad and Others), under Section 67 (5) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as well as order dated 19.05.2022 passed by Respondent No. 3, Tehsildar (Judicial)/Assistant Collector 1st Class, Tehsil Mohammadabad, Ghazipur in Case No. 4549 of 2021 (Gaon Sabha Vs. Saudagar), under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.

3. It is the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top