SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2581

SAURABH LAVANIA
Basudeo – Appellant
Versus
Murli – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Harguru Charan, U.S. Sahai, Uma Shankar Sahai
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Saurabh Lavania, J.

Heard.

2. Taking note of the facts of the case as also that the matter is extremely old and also that in view of order proposed to be passed no prejudice could be caused to private respondent(s), the issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s), as per the report(s) of the Office, is hereby dispensed with.

3. The petitioners namely Basdeo and Sukh Deo, sons of Gopal, by means of the present petition, have impeached the order dated 27.07.1971 (annexed as annexure No.4 to the petition) passed by the opposite party No.9-Deputy Director of Consolidation, Jaunpur, Camp at Faizabad, in Revision No.973 of 1971 preferred under Section 48 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (in short "Act of 1953"). The order dated 27.07.1971 reads as under:-

    "This is revision No. 973/1971 filed by Sri Ram Lal s/ o Sri Suchit against Sri Basdeo and others under section 48-48 of the Consolidation Holdings Act against the judgment and order of A.S.O.C. dated 19.6.71 in appeal No. 2247 in respect of khatas No. 114, 115, 118, 166 and 175 of village Sheikhpur, Malpura, Pargana Bidhar, Tahsil Tanda, District Faizabad.

    2. The parties in this case belong to the same family

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top