Back
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY
Brij Mohan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Mangal Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. undisputed facts regarding land ownership and transfers. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments on the legitimacy of sujan singh's transfer rights. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's reasoning on the effect of prior legal decisions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. determination of the void nature of the sale deed. (Para 16 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. final dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 22) |
JUDGMENT
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.
Facts which are not under dispute that one Sujan Singh, a sirdar of land bearing Khata No. 142 situated at village- Rajpura, Tehsil- Jalaun (at present Madhogarh), District- Jalaun, had deposited 20 times of land revenue in terms of Section 134 (prior to its omission by U.P. Act No. 8 of 1977 w.e.f. 28.01.1977) of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (for short "Act, 1950") on 14.11.1973 and on very next day, i.e. on 15.11.1973, said Sujan Singh had executed a sale deed in favour of petitioner herein and possession of land referred above was also handed over to him.
2. It is also not under dispute that Sujan Singh died even before Bhoomidhari Sanad was issued. It is not on record, whether legal heirs of deceased Sujan Singh have taken any inte
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of an asami to be recorded as bhumidhar with transferable right if the land is not covered under Section 77 of the U.P. Revenue ....
The judgment established that the issuance and extension of Patta, as well as the fulfillment of conditions for land ownership, are crucial in determining the rights of the petitioner.
The court reiterated that admissions in a written statement regarding property transactions create binding effects on claims of ownership, thereby restricting contesting rights based on previously es....
The longstanding possession of defendants as bhumidhars cannot be disregarded, and the Board of Revenue must adhere to factual findings of lower courts in its second appellate jurisdiction.
A recorded tenant's consent is essential for an unrecorded co-tenant to acquire Bhumidhari rights; absence of such consent invalidates claims to ownership.
Point of Law : Both courts erred in holding that once mutation proceedings are over with no objections from defendant-appellants, they are estopped from questioning the validity of sale deed dated.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
