SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2753

SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV
Kamal Singh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Satya Narayan Yadav
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

Table of Content
1. factual basis of anticipatory bail application (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments concerning applicant’s innocence and procedural history (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's reasoning for granting anticipatory bail (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. final orders regarding anticipatory bail issuance (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT

Shekhar Kumar Yadav, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No. 06 of 2023, registered under Section 306 IPC at Police Station- GRP Badaun/Kasganj, District Kasganj, during the pendency of trial.

3. In short, prosecution allegation is that on 31.08.2021 in the morning, husband of the informant had gone from his motorcycle to Bateshwar but did not return till evening, then informant is said to have informed Shikohabad Police Station that her husband had gone to Bateshwar but did not returned and extensive search has been made at all possible places. It is further alleged that on 01.09.2021 in the evening a telephone call was received from Soron District Etah that her husband had died after being hit by a train. It is furt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top