JUDGMENT

Shekhar Kumar Yadav, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No. 06 of 2023, registered under Section 306 IPC at Police Station- GRP Badaun/Kasganj, District Kasganj, during the pendency of trial.

3. In short, prosecution allegation is that on 31.08.2021 in the morning, husband of the informant had gone from his motorcycle to Bateshwar but did not return till evening, then informant is said to have informed Shikohabad Police Station that her husband had gone to Bateshwar but did not returned and extensive search has been made at all possible places. It is further alleged that on 01.09.2021 in the evening a telephone call was received from Soron District Etah that her husband had died after being hit by a train. It is further alleged that on 03.09.2001 at Shikohabad, informant received a letter by post, and on opening it, informant found a letter written by her husband on the pages of the diary, in which her husband had held responsible, the applicant and one Dr. Mrs. Kanta Srivastava for his death and besides her husband was deeply distressed by the corrupt behaviour of the applicant and one Dr Smt Kanta Srivastava and both of them instigated her husband to commit suicide.

4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that after registration of the FIR, applicant approached this Court by filing Criminal Misc Writ Petition for quashing of the said FIR and this Court vide order dated 15.2.2002 has granted interim stay of arrest of the applicant. Later on, the Investigating Officer after investigation submitted charge sheet in the matter on 3.3.2002 whereupon cognizable was taken by the learned court below vide order dated 27.4.2002. Thereafter, applicant again approached this Court by filing application under Section 482 challenging the charge sheet and the cognizance order and this court vide order dated 11.10.2002 stayed the further proceedings of the case. It is further submitted that the aforesaid application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. came to be dismissed in default on 19.10.2010. It is further submitted that and thereafter court below straightaway issued N.B.W. against the applicant on 18.09.2019 in view of judgement of Apex Court in the case of Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Private Ltd. and another v. Central Bureau of Investigation , (2018) 16 SCC 299 and also issued process under Section 82 /83 Cr.P.C. against the applicant vide order dated 30.05.2019.

5. It is further submitted that applicant approached the Court below by filing Anticipatory Bail, in which the court below, after considering the fact that during curse of investigation applicant was not arrested and has fully co-operated in the investigation and the charge sheet has been filed without his arrest, granted interim bail vide its order dated 14.06.2023. The said anticipatory bail application was later on dismissed by the court below vide order dated 13.07.2023, hence the present application before this Court.

6. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the allegation regarding harassment to the first informant and her husband is totally false as earlier neither they have made any complaint against the applicant nor any dispute has been taken place between the applicant and the first informant but only to harass the applicant present FIR has been lodged against the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has apprehension of arrest in the above m