SUDHANSHU DHULIA, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Jay Kishan – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, J.
1. Heard learned senior counsel/counsel for the parties.
2. Delay condoned.
3. Leave, as prayed for, granted.
4. The present appeal arises out of the Final Judgment and Order dated 17.01.2024 (hereinafter referred to as the “Impugned Judgment”)1 [2024 AHC 8159 DB] passed by a learned Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (hereinafter referred to as the “High Court”) in Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition2 [Abbreviated to “CRLMWP”] No. 19541/2023, whereby the High Court dismissed the Writ Petition filed by the appellants for quashing the First Information Report3 [Abbreviated to “FIR”] being CC4 [Abbreviation for “Case Crime”] No. 0092 of 2023, under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) lodged at Police Station - Bamrauli Katara, District - Agra, Uttar Pradesh.
BACKGROUND:
5. The FIR impugned before the High Court came to be registered against the appellants at the instance of the Station House Officer, Police Station - Bamrauli Katara on 26.11.2023 alleging, inter alia, that the appellants, being members of a gang led by Appellant
Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti vs. Pilibhit Pantnagar Beej Ltd.
Tolaram Relumal vs. State of Bombay
Iqbal Singh Marwah vs. Meenakshi Marwah
Govind Impex Pvt. Ltd. vs. Appropriate Authority, Income Tax Department
Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai vs. Dilip Kumar & Company
Shraddha Gupta vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Mohammad Wajid vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
The court emphasized that allegations must meet a serious threshold for invoking the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities Act, quashing an FIR based on insufficient grounds.
Gangster - Quash of FIR - A first information report on basis of a single case is valid and permissible under Act, 1986. No difficulty to hold that first information report may be lodged on basis of ....
An FIR under the Gangster Act is invalid if it fails to mention the corresponding provision, violating statutory guidelines.
An FIR registered under the U.P. Gangster Act without proper legal citation and after a three-year lapse is rendered illegal.
Indulge in anti-social activities - Disturbing public order - Existence of two criminal cases against petitioner is not in dispute and no ground exists for quashing impugned FIR.
(1) A person against whom a single FIR/charge sheet is filed for any of anti-social activities mentioned in section 2(b) of Gangsters Act, 1986 can be prosecuted under Gangsters Act.(2) Provisions of....
(1) Anti-Social Activity - Mere involvement of accused appellants in a demonstration pursuant to a communal flare-up, however serious, does not ipso facto transform participants into a ''gang'' witho....
Point of law: While holding the constitutional validity of the various provisions of the Gangster Act, the Court was of the view that under this Act, a person can be accused of an offence only if he ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.