SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1843

SIDDHARTH
Kari Arshad @ Arshad Mohmood Qasmi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant : Amit Rai
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

JUDGMENT

Siddharth, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. The present application has been moved by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 1137 of 2019, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 336, 452, 188, 427, 120B, 153A, 295A, 109 IPC, Section 3 of Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S. Kotwali City, District Bijnor with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on bail.

3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The applicant is not named in the FIR. In the FIR, it has been alleged that on 02.12.2019 at about 3.00 PM, a mob comprising about 250-300 persons, armed with lathi sticks and rods, have damaged vehicles lying parked at the side of the road and he has also assaulted the public persons. Learned counsel submitted that in fact Case Crime No. 1132 of 2019, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 188, 307, 323, 332, 336, 353, 427, 436, 120B, 153A, 295A, 109 IPC, Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Section 3 of Prevention of Damages to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top