Laxmi Devi vs State of U. P. - 2024 Supreme(All) 2061

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(All) 2061

NAND PRABHA SHUKLA
Laxmi Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sanjay Kumar Srivastav
For the Respondent: G.A. and Santosh Kumar Shukla

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla, J.-Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Srivastav, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Chandra Badan, learned AGA for the State, Sri Santosh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and perused the record.

2. The present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed to set aside the order dated 22.5.2024 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Pilibhit in Criminal Revision No. 02 of 2024 (Laxmi Devi and another v. Divya Deval and another) under Section 397 Cr.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District Pilibhit and impugned order dated 26.12.2023 passed by the learned City Magistrate, Pilibhit in Case No. 593 of 2022 (Computerised Case No. D202212560000593) (State v. Divya Deval and another) under Sections 145/146 Cr.P.C.

3. The main submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the impugned orders dated 26.12.2023 and 22.5.2024 passed by the Court concerned are illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper and bad in the eyes of law. It has also been contended that as per the sale-deed, the petitioners are the legal owners of the disputed house.

4. The said property was jointly purchased on 23.8.2013 in favour o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document