KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA
Naveen Chand Jain – Appellant
Versus
Manav Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Kshitij Shailendra, J.)
Supplementary-affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Rahul Sahai, learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant and Sri Anoop Trivedi, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Sri Nipun Singh, learned counsel for the defendant-respondent.
3. Since the appeal arises out of rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, only plaint averments and some documents forming part of plaint are relevant for deciding the matter and, hence, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, without summoning the record of trial Court, the instant appeal is being finally decided as necessary material has been appended alongwith the stay application as well as supplementary-affidavit filed today.
4. The plaintiff-appellant is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 10.11.2023, whereby learned Civil Judge (Senior Division)/F.T.C., Muzaffar Nagar has rejected the plaint of Original Suit No. 439 of 2018 (Naveen Chand Jain v. Manav Sharma) under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The said order amounts to ''decree'' under Section 2(2) CPC. Hence, this appeal under Section 96 CPC.
5. Brief facts giving rise to the instant appeal are that the plaintiff-appellant filed the afo
Church of Christ Charitable Trust & Educational Charitable Society v. Ponniamman Educational Trust
A plaint cannot be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC if it discloses a cause of action, even if the defendant has sold the property, as triable issues exist regarding interference in rights.
Mere plea of Order II Rule 2 of CPC taken up by the petitioners as defendants in the trial Court was not with respect to filing of the suit on the same cause of action, but, Order II Rule 2 of CPC wa....
(1) It is plaint averment that is required to be primarily considered at stage of considering application under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC.(2) Plea with respect to Order II Rule 2 of CPC has to be e....
The court's decision was based on the fulfillment of the agreement to sell, possession of the property, and the principles governing the grant of injunction.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of considering documents filed along with the plaint for deciding the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The judgment emphasized....
Suit for specific performance filed after dismissal of suit for injunction is barred under Order II Rule 2 CPC and deserves to be rejected.
The court affirmed that only the plaint's averments are to be considered in an application under Order 7 Rule 11, ruling that the plaint sufficiently disclosed a cause of action and other objections ....
The court emphasized that the plaint alone should be looked into to ascertain the cause of action, and the court cannot probe into the issue touching the merits of the case for deciding any applicati....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the power under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC should be exercised based on the statements made in the plaint itself and documents appended thereto,....
A plaint cannot be rejected if it discloses a cause of action, and non-parties to a compromise decree have the right to challenge its validity.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.