JUDGMENT :

RAJESH BINDAL, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. Aggrieved against the order¹[Order dated 27.09.2021] passed by the High Court²[High Court of Judicature at Allahabad] in Review Application³[Review Application No. 192 of 2021] in Civil Revision⁴[Civil Revision No. 28 of 2020], the plaintiff is in appeal before this Court. Vide aforesaid order, the application filed by respondent No. 1- defendant before the Trial Court⁵[Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kanpur Nagar] under Order VII Rule 11(d) C.P.C. was allowed and the suit filed by the appellant was dismissed.

3. Briefly stating, the facts available on record are that a Memorandum of Understanding⁶[Hereinafter referred to as ‘MoU’] was entered into between the appellant and respondent No. 1 on 31.08.1998, regarding sale of the property in question. It was specifically mentioned in the MoU that there is a litigation pending between the family members of the respondent No. 1. The sale deed will be got registered immediately after the litigation is over and the right of the vendor is determined. The respondent No. 1 shall inform the appellant when the rights of the parties are finalised. As the appellant came to know that the respondent No.