SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2191

CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Hindustan Aeronautics Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Diptiman Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Annapurna Singh Chandel, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Chandra Kumar Rai, J.

1. Heard Mr. Diptiman Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Annapurna Singh Chandel, learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 3.

2. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner- Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, a Central Government undertaking, incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, having its registered office at Bangalore, is engaged in the manufacturing, repairing and overhauling of sophisticated aircraft and other defence equipment in India. The present writ petition relates to the Transport, Aircraft Division, H.A.L., Kanpur Division which deals with manufacturing/maintaining/overhauling/repairing of transport aircraft used by defence forces of the nation. The petitioner has its certified standing orders which are certified by Certifying Officer as provided under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) and each division has a separate standing order which is approved by the competent authority/Certifying Officer. On 25.4.2016, the petitioner has submitted a draft for modification/amendment of certified standing orders before respondent no.3 under the provisions of Section 10 of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top