SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2191

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
Hindustan Aeronautics Limited - Appellant
Versus
Union of India and Others - Respondent
Writ C No.27633 of 2021
Decided on : 30-09-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Diptiman Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Annapurna Singh Chandel, Advocate

The dismissal of an appeal based on the alleged lack of authority of the representative was unjustified, necessitating a decision on the merits of the proposed amendment to the standing orders.

Headnote:(A) Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 2(d)(i) and 6 - Writ petition challenging the dismissal of an appeal regarding amendment of certified standing orders - The petitioner, a Central Government undertaking, sought to incorporate a clause for premature retirement of workmen, which was rejected by the appellate authority on grounds of maintainability due to alleged lack of authority of the representative. (Paras 2, 4, 10, 11)

(B) Appeal - Competence of representative - The dismissal of the appeal on the grounds of lack of proper authorization was found unjustified as the representative was duly authorized to file the appeal. (Paras 10, 11)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to amend certified standing orders to include a clause for premature retirement, which was rejected by the appellate authority. The appeal was dismissed on the basis that the representative lacked authority.

Findings of Court:
The dismissal of the appeal was set aside, and the matter was remitted back to the appellate authority for a decision on merit.

Issues: The main issues were the competence of the representative to file the appeal and the justification for rejecting the proposed amendment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the dismissal of the appeal on the grounds of maintainability was not in the interest of justice, especially since similar amendments had been approved in other divisions.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

JUDGMENT :

Chandra Kumar Rai, J.

1. Heard Mr. Diptiman Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Annapurna Singh Chandel, learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 3.

2. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner- Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, a Central Government undertaking, incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, having its registered office at Bangalore, is engaged in the manufacturing, repairing and overhauling of sophisticated aircraft and other defence equipment in India. The present writ petition relates to the Transport, Aircraft Division, H.A.L., Kanpur Division which deals with manufacturing/maintaining/overhauling/repairing of transport aircraft used by defence forces of the nation. The petitioner has its certified standing orders which are certified by Certifying Officer as provided under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) and each division has a separate standing order which is approved by the competent authority/Certifying Officer. On 25.4.2016, the petitioner has submitted a draft for modification/amendment of certified standing orders before respondent no.3 under the provisions of Section 10 of the Act. The petitioner filed an application on 13.6.2018 before respondent no.3, stating that certified standing orders at H.A.L., Barrackpore Division has been amended and new clause of pre-mature retirement of workman has been incorporated. On 25.4.2019, another application was filed before respondent no.3 on behalf of the petitioner, stating that clause of pre-mature retirement of the workman has been approved and incorporated in Lucknow as well as in Hyderabad Division of H.A.L. on 5.3.2019 and 6.3.2019 respectively. Another application was filed on behalf of the petitioner on 8.7.2019 before respondent no.3, requesting that proposed incorporation/modification of certified standing orders of H.A.L., Kanpur may also be approved. Respondent no.3 vide order dated 30.9.2020 rejected the proposed amendment/modification of certified standing orders. The petitioner challenged the order dated 30.9.2020 by way of appeal under Section 6 of the Act before respondent no.2 which has been dismissed under the impugned order dated 20.7.2021 on the ground that Mr. Jaspal Singh, Senior Manager (HR), H.A.L. is not competent to file the appeal. Hence, the instant writ petition for the following relief:-

“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 20.7.2021 passed by respondent no.2 (Annexure No.1 to the writ petition)

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing respondent no.2 to decide the appeal of the petitioner dated 19.10.2020 (Annexure no. 10 to the writ petition) afresh, through a reasoned and speaking order in respect of the proposed amendment/modification of certified standing orders of the petitioners.”

3. This Court vide order dated 25.10.2021 issued notice to respondent nos. 4 & 5. In pursuance of the order dated 25.10.2021, steps have been taken on behalf of the petitioner but nobody has put in appearance on their behalf although service is sufficient upon respondent nos. 4 & 5 according to office report dated 23.5.2024. No counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 3 who are represented by the office of the Asst. Solicitor General of India.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned orders have been passed in illegal and arbitrary manner. He further submitted that the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed on misconceived grounds that there was no proper power of attorney executed by the Factory Manager, although Senior Manager (HR) was duly competent and was delegated by the General Manager with the authority to represent H.A.L. before the appellate authority but the appeal has been dismissed on misconceived grounds. He further submitted that Nasik, Barrackpore, Luckonw and Cobra Division of H.A.L. have already incorporat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top