Back
SUDESH BANSAL
Mahaveer Pareek S/o Shri Dilsukh Rai – Appellant
Versus
Chairman And Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation – Respondent
ORDER :
Reportable
1. In all these writ petitions, challenge has been made to the impugned suspension order dated 20.06.2022, on similar grounds and controversy involved therein is identical in nature, therefore, with consent of learned counsel for both parties, all writ petitions have been heard together and would stand decided by this common Order. Facts of SB Civil Writ Petition No.9220/2022, are being taken as main case.
2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners were placed under suspension vide order dated 20.06.2022 (Ann.1) issued by the Director (Traffic), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur (hereinafter for short “the RSRTC”) and the suspension order is not accompanied with charge sheet, giving out reasons of suspension, therefore, the same is not sustainable in law being in violation of Clause 35(vi) of the Standing Orders of 1965. Petitioners submit that in the impugned suspension order itself, it is contained that charge sheet shall be issued within a period of 7 days and the suspension order without accompanying with the charge sheet ha
A suspension order must be accompanied by a charge sheet explaining the reasons for suspension.
Suspension orders must reflect independent decision-making by statutory authorities and cannot be arbitrary or merely routine; otherwise, they may violate constitutional rights.
The necessity for quasi-judicial bodies to provide reasons for their decisions and ensure fair hearing is essential to uphold the principles of natural justice.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appointing authority must exercise independent discretion when issuing a suspension order, as required by Regulation 4(1) of the Regulatio....
The main legal point established is that a suspension order must be reviewed within 90 days as per the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, and failure to do so ma....
Suspension by election authority valid for dereliction despite additional duties; no prior hearing required under CCA Rule 31.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
