MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Sanjay Dhingra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Manju Rani Chauhan, J.
1. These bail applications arises out of three first information reports, which are:
(ii) FIR /Case Crime No. 203 of 2023, dated 04.05.2023, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC, Police Station Noida Sector-20, District Gautam Buddh Nagar and
(iii) FIR/Case Crime No.255 of 2023, dated 08.06.2003, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B IPC, Noida Sector-20, District Gautam Buddh Nagar.
2. As per prosecution version in FIR/Case Crime No. 248/2023, dated 01.06.2023 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC, Police Station Noida Sector-20, Gautam Buddh Nagar, the informant – Sumit Yadav came to know about registration of fake firm, Yadav Traders, against his PAN Card No. AHFPX9874Q and the address is recorded as Ground Floor JL No. 219 Khatian No. 2275 dag no. 1835, Sahibganj Road, near Sahibganj, High School, Kharimala, Khagrabari Cooch behar West Bengal – 736101. Said Firm is got registered fallaciously against informant’s PAN Card AHFPX9874Q. It has been registered illegally by some unkn
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Ramendu Chattopadhyay (2020) 14 SCC 396
Gurcharan Singh v. State (Delhi Administration) (1978) 1 SCC 118
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan
Nimmagadda Prasad v. Central Bureau of Investigation
P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement (2020) 13 SCC 791 : (2020) 4 SCC (Cri) 646
Prahlad Singh Bhati v. NCT, Delhi and another
Puran v. Rambilas (2001) 6 SCC 338 : 2001 SCC (Cri) 1124
Rajesh Jindal v. Commissioner of Central Tax GST
Ram Govind Upadhyay v. Sudarshan Singh (2002) 3 SCC 598 : 2002 SCC (Cri) 688
Satendra Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and another
Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Nittin ohari and another
State of Bihar and another v. Amit Kumar alias Bachcha Rai
State of Gujarat v. Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal and another
The principle of double jeopardy does not apply when offences under IPC and GST Act are distinct, emphasizing the serious nature of economic crimes.
Economic offences involving fraudulent GST registrations require stringent scrutiny in bail applications due to their serious implications for public interest and financial integrity.
The court emphasized the serious nature of economic offences, affirming that bail is the exception, especially when substantial financial loss to the state is involved.
Any offence under this Act may, either before or after institution of prosecution, be compounded by Commissioner on payment, by person accused of the offence, to Central Government or State Governmen....
Economic offences, especially involving large sums and serious allegations, require stringent scrutiny of the accused's conduct, including attempts to abscond and prior criminal history, to deny bail....
The court established that in cases of economic offences, while the gravity of the allegations is significant, the presumption of innocence and the nature of evidence must also be considered when dec....
The severity of economic offences, the nature of evidence, and the larger interests of the public are crucial factors in determining bail under Section 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.