SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2401

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Ajeem - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
Criminal misc. Bail application No.27661 of 2024
Decided on : 09-08-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Irshad Ahmad, Mohd Faiz
For the Respondent: G.A.,R.P.S. Chauhan

Coercion in religious conversion violates individual rights and statutory provisions, justifying the rejection of bail.

Headnote:(A) U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 - Sections 3, 5, and 8 - Bail application rejected - Applicant accused of coercing informant to convert to Islam and perform Islamic rituals - Informant's statements under Section 164 CrPC corroborate allegations of coercion and captivity - No evidence presented by applicant to counter claims or demonstrate lawful conversion process. (Paras 2, 6, 11, 12)

(B) Fundamental Rights - Right to religious freedom - Individual rights must not infringe upon the rights of others - Coercion in religious conversion violates constitutional guarantees. (Paras 7, 8)

Facts of the case:
The applicant is accused of blackmailing and coercing the informant into converting to Islam, forcing her to witness animal sacrifice, and compelling her to adopt Islamic practices. The informant maintains her allegations in her FIR and subsequent statements.

Findings of Court:
The court found sufficient evidence of coercion and violation of the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, leading to the rejection of the bail application.

Issues: The main issues included whether the applicant's actions constituted coercion under the Act and whether the informant's rights were violated.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that coercion in religious conversion is impermissible and that the applicant failed to provide evidence of lawful conversion, thus justifying the rejection of bail.

Result: Bail application stands rejected.

JUDGMENT :

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

2. By means of this application, applicant, who is involved in Case Crime No. 223 of 2024, under Sections 323/504/506 IPC and Section 3/5(1) U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, Police Station Kotwali, District Budaun, seeks enlargement on bail during the pendency of trial.

3. The prosecution story, as unfolded from the FIR, is that the applicant had made videos of the informant and was blackmailing her. He had sexually exploited the informant and was pressuring her to marry with him. The informant was living with the applicant and she was being forced to accept Islam, and also to eat non-vegetarian foods. She was also asked to wear clothes as worn by Muslims.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he has been falsely implicated in the present case and the informant was in love with the applicant and she had left on her own. Earlier, an FIR was registered as Case Crime No. 254 of 2023 in which the statement under Section 161 CrPC was recorded wherein she had admitted the fact that she had solemnized marriage with the applicant. Learned counsel further submits that in statement recorded under Section 164 CrPC in Case Crime No. 254 of 2023 she had stated that marriage was solemnized between the applicant and informant. Learned counsel for the applicant next contended that the applicant is languishing in jail since 27.06.2023, deserves to be released on bail. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and shall cooperate with trial.

5. Learned AGA while opposing the bail application submitted that the statement of girl which was recorded under Section 164 CrPC, in the present case, clearly reveals that she was being coerced to accept Islam and she had further stated in her statement that without any conversion her Nikah ceremony was performed with the applicant and further on the day of Bakrid, father-in-law had asked the informant to come and see how sacrifice was given, which she has refused to see. Learned AGA further submits that the writ Court on 07.06.2023 in Writ-C No. 19879 of 2023 had not granted any relief to the applicant for giving protection.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of material on record, it is clear that the informant in her statement recorded under Section 164 CrPC had categorically stated that the applicant and his family members were coercing her to accept Islam and she was also being forced to witness the animal sacrifice, which was being done on the day of Bakrid and also to cook and eat non-vegetarian foods.

7. The U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 received the assent of Governor on 04.03.2021 and was published in the government gazette on 05.03.2021. The basic object and reason of the enforcement of the Act was to guarantee religious freedom to all persons which reflects the social harmony and spirit of India. The objective of this Act was to sustain the spirit of secularism in India. According to the Constitution, State has no religion and all religions are equall before the Sate, and no religion shall be given preference over the other. All persons are free to preach, practice and propagate any religion of their choice.

8. The Constitution confers on each individual the fundamental right to profess, practice and propagate his religion. However, the individual right to freedom of conscience and religion cannot be extended to construe a collective right to proselytize, the right to religious freedom belongs equally to the person converting and the individual sought to be converted.

9. Section 2 (a), (b), (c) and (d) of the Act of 2021 defines "allurement" "coercion" "conversion" and "force". According to the aforesaid definition 'allurement' means and includes an offer for any temptation in any form, 'coercion' means compelling an individual to act again

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top