SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2401

ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
Ajeem – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Irshad Ahmad, Mohd Faiz
For the Respondent: G.A.,R.P.S. Chauhan

JUDGMENT :

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

2. By means of this application, applicant, who is involved in Case Crime No. 223 of 2024, under Sections 323/504/506 IPC and Section 3/5(1) U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, Police Station Kotwali, District Budaun, seeks enlargement on bail during the pendency of trial.

3. The prosecution story, as unfolded from the FIR, is that the applicant had made videos of the informant and was blackmailing her. He had sexually exploited the informant and was pressuring her to marry with him. The informant was living with the applicant and she was being forced to accept Islam, and also to eat non-vegetarian foods. She was also asked to wear clothes as worn by Muslims.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he has been falsely implicated in the present case and the informant was in love with the applicant and she had left on her own. Earlier, an FIR was registered as Case Crime No. 254 of 2023 in which the statement under Section 161 CrPC was recorded wherein she had admitted the fact that she had solemnized marriage with the applicant. Lea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top