Madeena vs State of U. P. - 2024 Supreme(All) 2335

Breaking News

Back Next

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(All) 2335

JASPREET SINGH
Madeena – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Rajeiu Kumar Tripathi
For the Respondents: Nitin Srivastav, Pankaj Gupta, Santosh Kumar Tripathi

Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT :

JASPREET SINGH, J.

1. Heard Shri Rajeiu Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Ajay Kumar Singh Tomar, learned counsel for the State-respondent Nos. 1 to 4, Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for respondent No. 5 and Shri Nitin Srivastava, learned counsel for private respondent Nos. 6 and 7.

2. In view of the controversy, which is involved in the instant petition, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is being disposed of at the admission stage itself.

3. The petitioner has approached this Court assailing the order dated 27.06.2024 passed by respondent No. 4 entertaining the revision preferred by private respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and granting an interim order, whereby the order dated 01.05.2024 passed by the Tehsildar impugned therein has been stayed.

4. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the mutation proceedings were being contested between the petitioner and private respondent Nos. 6 and 7. After hearing the parties, the court of Tehsildar, P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document