A. N. VARMA, K. C. AGRAWAL, SATISH CHANDRA
Mahendras Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Hafiz Khalil – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K.C. Agrawal, J. - This Full Bench has been constituted to decide the correctness of the decision in Khalil Ahmad and Others Vs. Additional District Judge, Gorakhpur and Others, AIR 1974 All 422 .
2. The facts of the case relevant for deciding the reference are these. Hafiz Khalil, opposite party No. 1 filed Suit No. 309 of 1972 for injunction against Smt. Jiwan Kaur (since deceased) and Sardar Inder Singh restraining them from making any construction on the land in suit, and further from interfering in his right of egress and ingress over the land in dispute.
3. Smt. Jiwan Kaur died on November 17, 1974. The Plaintiff did not move any substitution application and setting aside abatement within time prescribed by law. Much after the expiry of time, the Plaintiff applied on 18th May, 1976, under Order XXII, Rule 4 of the CPC for substitution on the ground that he had acquired knowledge of the death of deceased Smt. Jiwan Kaur on 27th March, 1976. Thereafter, he moved two applications, one for condonation of delay and thereafter on 7th September, 1976 for setting aside the abatement.
4. Having held that the delay had not been satisfactorily explained, as there was no sufficient
Khalil Ahmad and Others Vs. Additional District Judge, Gorakhpur and Others
Jagdish Chander Chatterjee and Others Vs. Shri Kishan and Another
Rameshwar Prasad and Others Vs. Shyam Beharilal Jagannath and Others
Mohan Raj Vs. Surendra Kumar Taparia and Others
Bibi Rahmani Khatoon and Others Vs. Harkoo Gope and Others
Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala and Others Vs. Shahzada Nand and Sons and Others
Razia Begum Vs. Sahebzadi Anwar Begum and Others
Godde Venkateswara Rao Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Union of India (UOI) Vs. Ram Charan and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.