SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(All) 719

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
B.D. AGARWAL, J.
Shri Ram & Anr. - Appellant
Versus
Smt. Kasturi Devi & Anr. - Respondent
Second Appeal No's. 950, 1604 and 1605 of 1978
Decided On : 20-09-1983

Advocates appeared:
K.C. Saxena, R.S. Misra, D.P. Singh and S.P. Srivastava, for the Appellant; Santosh Kumar and A.K. Banerjee, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

B.D. Agarwal, J. - These three connected second appeals are directed against the judgment and decree of the VI Additional District Judge. Meerut, dated February 28, 1978.

2. The following pedigree will serve to elucidate the relevant facts of the case.

                                                    Jwala Prasad                          ___________________|_________________                         |                                                               |                  Mool Chand                                                 Nanuwa Singh              = Kastoori Devi                         |________________                                                      |                      ___________________|_______________________                    |                                 |                                       |              Smt. Prakashwati           Dhapo                              Malloo                 = Sri Ram                = Kanchchi          ________|_________________________________________________          |                                   |                                  |                            |     Smt. Kamla  Devi          Chatrapal                    Chetan Pal             Satya Pal

The dispute relates to house No. 46 situate in Mohalla Chatta, Delhi Gate. Ghaziabad. Mool Chand was admittedly the exclusive owner of this house. He died on 2nd September, 1968. Smt. Kastoori Devi, the widow of Mool Chand, contends that prior to his death, Mool Chand executed a will in her favour on August 30, 1968, in respect of this house. She instituted Original Suit No. 319 of 1971 on March 17, 1971 for eviction of Sri Ram and his son Satya Pal alleging that they were her tenants on rent at the rate of Rs. 20/- per month besides Rs. 4/- per month for electricity charges and that she is the exclusive owner landlady. The rent was in arrears since October 1, 1968. The tenancy was determined by a combined notice u/s 3 of the U. P. Act III of 1947 read with Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act dated 7-11-1970 The relief sought was for eviction from the house and recovery of arrears of rent besides damages for use and occupation at the rate of Rs. 24/- per month. Nanuwa Singh was arrayed as pro forma defendant No. 3 to the suit since he had made purchase of half share in the house from Smt. .Kastoori Devi by a registered deed dated 26th October. 1963.

3. Original Suit No. 1017 of 1971 was instituted on Auaust 20, 1971 by Salva Pal against Smt. Kastoori Devi contending that he is the adopted son of Mool Chand deceased. He had been living, it was said, in a portion of House No. 46 aforesaid in capacity as the adopted "on, but Smt. Kastoori Devi threatened and intended to evict him and hence the relief sought for perpetual injunction. This Suit has given rise to Second Appeal No. 1005 of 1978.

4. Original Suit No. 154 of 1971 was brought by Smt. Kamla Devi. daughter of Sri Ram on August 31 1971 claiming partition of the house abovementioned. She asserts that she has 19th share in the house and that her brother Satya Pal had been adopted by Mool Chand deceased. Second Appeal No. 1604 of 1978 has arisen from this suit.

5. In defence to the suits instituted by Satya Pal and Smt. Kamla Devi, it was pleaded by Smt. Kastoori Devi that Mool Chand executed will in her favour dated August. 30, 1968 whereby she is the absolute and exclusive owner of the said house. It was refuted that Satya Pal had been adopted by Mool CHAND. It was denied that the children of Sri Ram have no share in the house. In the suit which Smt. Kastoori Devi filed, the defence raised by Satya Pal and Sri Ram has been that there was no will made by Mool Chand and that Satya Pa] had been adopted by the deceased. It was refuted by them that Smt. Kastoori Devi is the exclusive owner on the death of her husband.

6. The three suits were tried together and dismissed by the Additional Civil Judge. Ghaziabad. on March 31, 1971. It was held t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top