Back
G. K. MATHUR, S. D. AGARWALA
Ramesh Chandra Mishra – Appellant
Versus
U. P. Secondary Education Services Commission – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.D. Agarwala and G.K. Mathur, JJ. - This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Counter-affidavits and rejoinder-affidavits have been exchanged. The parties had agreed that the petition itself may be disposed of at this stage
2. The petitioner, Raraesh Chandra Misra, is Principal of Basant Theosophical Uchatar Madhyamib Vidyalaya, Kamachha, Varanasi, hereinafter referred to as 'School'.
3. The petitioner was appointed as Principal of the school on 5th July, 1977. He was thereafter confirmed on the said post. The school is a recognised Higher Secondary School and is on the grants-in-aid list of the State Government.
4. On the basis of certain reports made by the audit and certain complaints received by the Management in regard to the admission of the students, the petitioner was suspended by the Management pending enquiry by an order dated 28th April, 1987. This order of suspension was revoked by the District Inspector of Schools by his order dated 18th June, 1987. The Management again passed second suspension order against the petitioner on 1st July, 1987. This suspension order was not approved by the District Inspector of Schools and it lapsed autom
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
