SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2265

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
Subhash Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Gaurav Pundir
For the Respondent: G.A., Hitesh Kumar Mishra

1. Heard Shri N.I. Zafri, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Shri Gaurav Pundir, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri S.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the complainant and learned Additional Advocate General, assisted by Shri J.K. Upadhyay, learned A.G.A. for the Staterespondent.

2. Succinctly, the crux of the allegations are that the complainant's father had four shops in his name bearing no.7/11, 7/1, 7/2, 7/8, and his mother had two shops in her name bearing No. 7/11 and 7/4, respectively, situated at Ramganj, Sarai Hakeem Bannaderi, District Aligarh. Petitioner no. 3, who is the elder brother of the complainant's father, in connivance with other applicants, executed two forged power of attorneys dated 06.04.2023 in which, apparently, Amita Rani- the mother of complainant, authorized Gaurav and his wife Priyanka to execute the sale-deed and appoint advocate, and to take care of the demised property for and on her behalf, and Pradeep Kumar – the father of complainant, authorized Subhash Chandra, his younger brother to execute the sale deed and appoint advocate, and to take care of the demised property for and on his behalf, besides, other allegations of restraining, abusing an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top